Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Motriz (Online) ; 27: e1021016920, 2021. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1180846

ABSTRACT

Abstract Aims: This study aimed to present a technical evaluation proposal for the crawl stroke that can be used with large groups of swimmers, based on an observation sheet. Methods: Fifteen healthy university students aged between 18 and 30 years were chosen to participate in the study. The subjects were recorded swimming at a distance of 50 meters using the crawl technique at a comfortable and self-determined speed. The recordings simulated docent observation capacity. Five swimming teachers were selected to evaluate the proposed checklist and the subjects' technique. An observation sheet was created based on references present in literature containing ten items that are considered fundamental for swimming movements. The study was divided into (i) checklist validation, (ii) intra-evaluator consistency, and (iii) inter-evaluator consistency. Results: The proposed checklist fulfilled the validity criteria, with intra-evaluator consistency varying between reasonable and substantial, with k varying between 0.36 and 0.73 respectively, while inter-evaluator consistency was deemed reasonable (k = 0.24). Conclusion: According to the results that were obtained, the suggested list is valid and adequate for what it proposes to do.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Swimming/trends , Athletic Performance , Athletes , Observation/methods
2.
Pensar Prát. (Online) ; 2317/04/2020. Ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1128740

ABSTRACT

O objetivo desta revisão sistemática é identificar os métodos de avaliação para a aprendizagem da natação que são utilizados/propostos na literatura. Foram avaliados estudos nas bases Pubmed, Scielo e Lilacs. Quinze estudos foram selecionados e os resultados indicam que: os instrumentos avaliativos adotados atendem satisfatoriamente os critérios de validade científica; as amostras utilizadas são predominantemente de crianças; os estudos dão preferência aos questionários tipo checagem e à utilização de vídeos; os itens são demasiadamente longos para aplicação prática; a relação tempo/fadiga é desconsiderada na descrição. No final, realizamos sugestões para futuras pesquisas e para a avaliação da natação.


This systematic review aimed to identify which methods are used or proposed for qualitative assessment of swimming techniques, identifying how these are characterized and how they are applied. Fifteen studies were selected, but only four were aimed at validating instruments, while the others only applied evaluations. The results indicate that: the evaluation instruments adopted satisfactorily meet the criteria of scientific validity; the samples used are predominantly of children; the studies give preference to checking questionnaires and the use of filming; items are too long for practical application; the relationship beetwen time and fatigue is disregarded in test descriptions. In the end, we make suggestions for future research and for swimming assessment.


Esta revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo identificar qué métodos están siendo utilizados o propuestos para la evaluación cualitativa de las técnicas de natación, identificando cómo se caracterizan y cómo se aplican. Se seleccionaron quince estudios y los resultados indican que: los instrumentos de evaluación adoptados en la literatura cumplen satisfactoriamente los criterios de validez científica; Las muestras utilizadas son predominantemente de niños; los estudios dan preferencia a los cuestionarios de verificación de tipos y uso de videos; los artículos son demasiado largos para la aplicación práctica; La relación tiempo / fatiga no se tiene en cuenta en la descripción de la prueba. Al final, hicimos sugerencias para futuras investigaciones y evaluaciones técnicas de la natación.


Subject(s)
Humans , Swimming , Learning , Motor Activity , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Fatigue
3.
Fisioter. Bras ; 18(6): f:757-I:766, 2017.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-908716

ABSTRACT

O processo de desenvolvimento motor ocorre de acordo com o padrão estabelecido por fatores biológicos e também pela influência de fatores ambientais/sociais. O status socioeconômico familiar pode ser um importante fator interveniente nas possibilidades de adquirir as habilidades motoras fundamentais necessárias ao desenvolvimento geral da criança, com sérias implicações futuras. Este trabalho tem como objetivo analisar as possíveis relações entre status socioeconômico sobre as habilidades motoras grossas em indivíduos em idade escolar. Metodologicamente utilizamos uma revisão sistemática com as as palavras-chave (children, fundamental motor skills, motor skills, gross motor skills, motor ability, motor competence, gross motor competence, motor skill proficiency, socioeconomic status, low economic income) para identificar artigos de banco de dados eletrônicos Scopus e PubMed, resultando em 19 artigos que formaram esta revisão. Os critérios de inclusão foram: a) escolares com idades entre 6 e 15 anos; b) avaliação das habilidades motoras grossas; c) houvesse dois ou mais grupos da amostra classificados quanto ao status socioeconômico e d) crianças hígidas. Os principais resultados mostraram uma prevalência de crianças de alto status socioeconômico com maior pontuação nas habilidades motoras em relação às crianças de baixo status socioeconômico, mas este resultado não foi homogêneo. (AU)


The motor development process occurs according to the pattern established by biological factors and by environmental/social factors influence. Family socioeconomic status can be an important intervening factor in the possibilities of acquiring the fundamental motor skills necessary for the general development of the child, with serious future implications. This work aimed to analyze the possible relationships between socioeconomic status on gross motor skills in school age individuals. Methodologically, we used a systematic review with the following keywords (children, fundamental motor skills, motor skills, motor ability, motor competence, motor skill proficiency, socioeconomic status, low economic income) to identify data, resulting in 19 articles that composed this review. The inclusion criteria were: a) schoolchildren aged between 6 and 15 years; b) gross motor skills performance evaluation; c) two or more sample groups classified as socioeconomic status and d) healthy children. The main results showed a prevalence of high socioeconomic status children with higher scores in motor skills compared to low socioeconomic status children, but this result was not homogeneous. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adolescent , Motor Skills , Child , Poverty , Social Class
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL